Structured Settlement | Lump-Sum Settlement Alternative

MG Law Injury Lawyers

Can Structured Settlement Ensure Financial Security and Long-Term Stability? 

Imagine you’ve overcome a serious injury, the physical scars slowly fading, but the financial burden lingers. Medical bills pile up, work opportunities are limited, and the future feels uncertain. In this scenario, a traditional lump-sum settlement, while seemingly appealing, might not be the most sustainable solution. Enters structured settlement!

Structured Settlement  

In the aftermath of an injury, the initial focus is often on healing. But as the physical wounds mend, financial concerns can loom large. Structured settlements offer an alternative path, providing a steady stream of income designed to meet your long-term needs and ease the financial burden. It ultimately allows you to focus on recovery and rebuilding your life. Let’s delve deeper and explore the world of structured settlements to see if they hold the key to your financial security. 

How Does Structure Settlement Work? 

Navigating the next steps after personal injury can be daunting. While seeking compensation is a primary concern, the method of receiving it holds equal significance. This is where structured settlements step in, providing an alternative to conventional lump-sum payments and laying the foundation for sustained financial stability. 

Imagine a scenario where an injured party, the claimant, sues the responsible party, the defendant, to recover compensation for their injuries. If the defendant is found liable (loses the case) or a settlement is reached outside of court, a structured settlement can be established as an alternative to a lump-sum payment. 

  1. The defendant (or their insurance company) might choose to involve an assignment company. This company takes on the responsibility of making the payments to the claimant. 
  1. The assignment company then purchases a structured settlement annuity from an insurance company. An annuity is a financial product that guarantees a stream of payments over time. 
  1. The defendant pays the settlement amount to the assignment company. 
  1. The insurance company invests the settlement amount and uses the earnings to make the agreed-upon payments to the claimant according to the terms of the settlement. These payments can be spread out over months, years, or even a lifetime, depending on the specific agreement. 

Pros and Cons of Structure Settlement 

Structured settlements offer a different avenue, but it’s crucial to carefully consider both the benefits and drawbacks before reaching a decision. While they provide steady income and potential tax advantages, they may lack some flexibility compared to lump-sum payments. Taking the time to evaluate these factors ensures a choice that aligns with your long-term financial goals. 

Pros 

  • Long-term security: Structured settlements provide a predictable and consistent income stream over a specified period, offering financial stability and peace of mind. This is particularly beneficial for individuals with ongoing medical expenses or those who may struggle to manage a large sum of money responsibly. 
  • Tax advantages: In many cases, the payments received from a structured settlement are tax-free, unlike a lump sum payment which may be subject to taxation. This translates to a greater sum of money being available over the long term. 
  • Reduced risk of financial mismanagement: A structured settlement helps avoid the temptation to spend a large sum of money quickly, which can happen with a lump sum payment. This can be especially crucial for individuals who are unfamiliar with managing significant financial resources. 
  • Customization: Structured settlements offer flexibility in terms of payment structure. The amount, frequency, and duration of payments can be tailored to the individual’s specific needs and circumstances. 
  • Future needs protection: Some structured settlements can be designed to include guaranteed payments for specific future needs, such as education or retirement, ensuring long-term financial security. 

Cons

  • Loss of control: Unlike a lump sum payment, a structured settlement limits immediate access to a large sum of money. This can be inconvenient if unforeseen expenses arise or if the individual needs a significant amount of money upfront. 
  • Limited flexibility: While some structured settlements offer the option to sell future payments for a lump sum, this option typically comes with a discount and may not be readily available in all cases. 
  • Potential legal fees: Setting up a structured settlement often involves legal and administrative fees, which can reduce the overall amount received. 
  • Dependence on the funding institution: The security of the payments relies on the financial stability of the funding institution, such as an insurance company. 
  • Loss of potential investment growth: Unlike a lump sum that can be invested, the money in a structured settlement is typically not accessible for investment purposes, potentially limiting growth opportunities. 

Types of Structured Settlement Cases 

While personal injury cases are commonly associated with structured settlements, their application extends far beyond this realm. Here’s a glimpse into the diverse legal scenarios where structured settlements can be a valuable option: 

1. Personal Injury 

Motor vehicle accidents: Collisions often result in long-term medical needs, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Structured settlement can provide a steady income stream to cover these ongoing expenses and ensure financial security for the future. 

Medical malpractice: When medical negligence results in injury, a structured settlement can help manage the associated financial burden, including medical bills, lost wages, and potential future care needs. 

Work-related injuries: Workplace accidents can leave individuals with permanent disabilities and require ongoing medical care. Structured settlements can offer financial stability and peace of mind by providing a predictable income stream to manage these long-term expenses. 

2. Wrongful Death 

Loss of a loved one: In the tragic event of wrongful death, structured settlements can help surviving family members replace lost income, cover funeral expenses, and meet future financial needs, particularly for dependent children or spouses. 

3. Product Liability 

Defective products: When faulty products cause injuries, structured settlements can offer a way to secure financial compensation for ongoing medical care, lost wages, and potential future needs arising from the injury. 

4. Mass Tort 

Class-action lawsuits: In cases involving many claimants with similar claims against a single entity, structured settlements can provide a fair and efficient way to distribute compensation, ensuring everyone receives a steady income stream over time. 

5. Contract Disputes 

Breach of contract: When a contract is breached, and the resulting damage has long-term financial implications, a structured settlement can be used to provide ongoing compensation to the injured party. 

6. Environmental Claims 

Exposure to toxins: In cases of environmental contamination or exposure to harmful substances, structured settlements can offer a way to manage the associated long-term medical needs and financial burdens. 

Assigned vs. Unassigned Cases 

In an assigned case, a third-party company purchases your settlement rights and uses them to obtain an annuity, assuming responsibility for your payments. This can be appealing if you need immediate access to cash, as these companies often offer an initial lump sum payment. Additionally, the defendant’s involvement is simplified, as they pay the settlement amount directly to the assignment company.  

However, be aware that these conveniences come at a cost. Assignment companies charge fees, which can significantly reduce your overall payout compared to an unassigned case. Additionally, by selling your rights, you relinquish some control over the settlement structure and rely on the company to manage the annuity effectively. 

In an unassigned case, the defendant directly purchases the annuity and becomes responsible for making your payments. This approach offers the potential for a higher overall payout as there are no assignment fees. Additionally, you retain more control over the settlement structure, allowing you to negotiate terms directly with the defendant.  

However, this option also comes with drawbacks. Unlike assigned cases, you typically won’t receive an immediate lump sum payment. Furthermore, the defendant assumes the added complexity of managing the annuity and ensuring timely disbursements. 

Final Verdict on Structured Settlement  

Structured settlements offer a unique approach to receiving compensation. However, while this approach can offer numerous advantages, navigating the complexities of structured settlements requires careful consideration.  

Consulting with a qualified legal and financial advisor is crucial to ensure the chosen structure aligns with your specific needs and financial goals. At MG Law, we understand the importance of informed decision-making. We can connect you with reputable resources to explore various structured settlement options and ensure they align with your long-term well-being.  

Remember, for all your accident-related matters, don’t hesitate to contact MG Law. We’re dedicated to advocating for your best interests and helping you navigate the legal landscape with confidence.

Book your free consultation

We're here to help

Book your free consultation

Our team communicates in English, French, Greek, all Arabic dialects, Mandarin, and Russian, so you can feel more comfortable with our representation.